US gains edge as EU tightens crypto rules
MiCA’s rollout fuels speculation of talent migrating toward friendly regulation

This week, the European Union’s landmark crypto regulation, the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework, came into full effect. While it promises consumer protection and regulatory clarity, some industry players worry that tighter rules might stifle innovation and drive talent and businesses to more crypto-friendly regions like the US.
MiCA’s implementation comes after nearly three years of development, with its phased rollout culminating in stricter guidelines for crypto asset issuers and service providers. It aims to ensure transparency, accountability, and consumer protection across the 27-member bloc. However, critics argue that these stringent measures could limit growth and push businesses out of Europe.
Across the Atlantic, the US could be poised to capitalize on Europe’s restrictive approach. Recent political shifts, including the nomination of pro-crypto Paul Atkins to lead the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), suggest a potential move toward more business-friendly policies.
Charlyn Ho, founder of leading tech law firm Rikka Group, believes that rather than establishing an overarching regulatory regime, the term of the new leaders could lead to increased clarity in crypto operations. “The change we'll see is hopefully a decrease in such regulation by enforcement and perhaps more of a proactive, business-friendly, crypto-friendly approach taken by the agency as opposed to more of an antagonistic one,” she told Cointelegraph.
However, Ho also cautioned that major changes would require legal processes, noting that the commissioner doesn't have unfettered discretion to completely change everything that's in process.
In Europe, some experts express concern about MiCA’s impact on the market. Catherine Smirnova of Digital & Analogue Partners noted that while the framework offers much-needed clarity, it could push businesses to relocate. It remains to be seen whether the crypto market will stay within the EU or if the regulatory constraints will eventually drive it out.
Meanwhile, the EU’s upcoming Digital Fairness Act, which is under public review, could add further compliance burdens for digital businesses, intensifying pressure on the sector.
As global regulators grapple with balancing innovation and consumer protection, the divergence between the EU and US approaches could have lasting impact. MiCA’s comprehensive framework offers regulatory certainty but risks limiting flexibility for businesses. In contrast, a potentially more crypto-friendly stance in the US might attract innovation and investment.
The full implementation of MiCA solidifies Europe’s role as a pioneer in crypto regulation, but its long-term effect on the industry’s trajectory remains uncertain.